Monday, April 25, 2011

What Is Happening to Writing? Essay!


Annik Spencer
April 27, 2011
WSC 2
Dr. Lay
What Is Happening to Writing?
           

            The author Eric Maisel said in his book, A Writer's Space: Make Room to Dream, to Work, to Write, that “The writing life is defined by the succession of choices you make, primary among them whether or not you will write. You honor your writing space by entering it with this mantra: ‘I am ready to work.’ You enter, grow quiet, and vanish into your writing.”  This quote describes what it is like for a writer to create.  Inspiration and imagination is what did, and still does, compel humans to write down his or her thoughts.  Writers have been vanishing into their own personal “writing spaces” to create writing for many years.  Just like the ideas and thoughts of authors change, authors writing spaces change and develop as well.  The way in which we create and write changes the way that we transcribe writing.
      To appreciate writing it is important to understand why written work is essential. In Chapter 2, "Writing as Technology," in J. David Bolter’s book, Writing Space, he discusses the evolution of writing and writing surfaces in his section titled, "Hard and Soft Structures."  Writing has always been a necessary and valuable way for people to remember events and stories.  This is why symbols and language were created in the first place.  Old texts were then translated, so modern audiences could comprehend and read them.  These texts were often translated to "fit the times" and translators often changed, restructured and rewrote them.  These are all considered hard structures because they are "tangible qualities of the materials of writing" (Bolter 41).  Bolter explains soft structures as being how we present our text visually.  The way we present our writing has evolved as well.  Bolter says that we have introduced grammar, punctuations, paragraphing, and chapter divisions so that the modern reader can more easily read the text.  The very first example of a soft structure was actually the alphabet because it was the first time the ancient people had put together a structured way of how to present ideas, or how to write.
This section, “Hard and Soft Structures” also discusses how text is restructured, changed, and sometimes even rewritten so that it will make sense to the modern reader.  The first change is the actual writing space itself.  Bolter discusses how in ancient times things were written on papyrus.  And before the printing press was invented, scribes wrote down text by hand on paper.  The final evolution is the technological evolution of writing spaces.  Bolter says that is evolution is inevitable because the writing space must evolve with the times so that the reader may understand it.  
Writing spaces have grown and changed over time.  Chapter 5, “The Electronic Book” of Writing Space discusses the evolution of writing spaces, specifically how the papyrus evolved into the codex.  Bolter says that the papyrus was the first form of the "book."  Papyrus were usually about 25 feet, but there length was not predetermined.  The author would simply write until he or she felt that their story was finished and then they would cut the papyrus.  Papyruses were also rolled like a scroll, not bound.  Stories were a large part of the culture at that time and papyrus rolls were the most effective way to transcribe the stories that were being told.  Storytelling was the main form of entertainment and so papyruses were mainly scripts that storytellers would use.
Writing was not done in a sequential order, but at random.  Other works could be added before, during, or after the papyrus was written.  Writers wrote as much as they wanted on a papyrus because one’s space was not predetermined and the author could write with no stopping point.  All of these elements of papyrus writing changed how the writer wrote because ideas were not continuous, writing was never stopped, and other works could be referenced or added.  
The shift from papyrus to codexes not only was a change of physical writing space, but also a change in the way humans wrote.  This is because people began to have an interest in writing down more complete thoughts and ideas.  Also, society wanted to transcribe information and facts onto paper and this could be more easily done in a codex.  Because the writing space changed the way the author thought, the way the author wrote ultimately changed as well.  This is mainly because a codex was more complete and other works could not be referenced or added to it.  Writing now had to be planned and organized before the writer began to write because the codex had pages bound together with a cover.  The codex eventually evolved into today’s modern book. 
Codexes replaced papyrus because they were more complete and bound together.  They protected and limited writing and made written work a complete verbal structure.  They were different from papyrus rolls because they had to fill predetermined space.  Codexes also closed off other works because they were only one story long where papyrus rolls would sometimes include other works. 
After papyruses and codexes, writing spaces finally developed and changed with electronic age with the introduction of WebPages and eBooks.  WebPages remind the reader of the days of papyrus.  This is because WebPages are not sequential and can be changed and added to.  The use of hypertext on WebPages makes the website multi-dimensional and not chronological.  Chapter 3 of Writing Space by Bolter, "Hypertext and the Remediation of Hypertext," defines hypertext, discusses the existence of hypertext, and the difference between hypertext and regular text.  The chapter describes hypertext as being a link on a webpage that can create relationships between different things.  Hypertext creates a network.  It can take the reader on a path, from one idea to another.  Also hypertext and WebPages are very different from today’s modern book.  Books give the reader control, but not as much imagination.  Hypertext can enhance the imagination and overall experience for the reader.  The new invention of the eBook takes the modern book digital.  Society had moved to the electronic age, and so the writing spaces have had to change to fit this new era.
Another comparison of how writing spaces can change the way the author creates is verbal text versus written text.  Verbal text may seem like an unusual form of writing, but all speech can be written down as it is being said, so it can be considered writing.  In fact, the contrast of spoken text and written text strongly demonstrates how writing spaces can change.  The writing space of written text is obviously on wherever it is written, but the writing space of oral text is much more complex.  The writing space for verbal text is the listener’s ear.
Chapter 6, “Refashioned Dialogues” of Writing Space talks about the differences between spoken and written text.  The chapter discusses the variation in the thought processes of the written philosopher, Plato, and the oral philosopher, Socrates.  Bolter says, “It may be harder to hoodwink a reader than a listener because the reader can stop at anytime, reflect, and refer to a previous section of the text” (Bolter 102).  Plato was a written philosopher and he wrote all of his theories down, his readers could interpret or use his text any way they wished.  This frustrated Plato because his teacher, Socrates, was an oral philosopher.  Socrates could easily convince his audience because he could guide a path for his listeners to follow.  His listeners would never argue or challenge Socrates’ oral teachings because they we were so easily convinced by his speeches.  The reader can control how the information is interpreted when the text is written.  “The question of control can be posed in the absence of writing…” (Bolter 101) and thus Plato had to understand that the reader might read his philosophies in the wrong way.  Because the reader has the control, Plato and all other written speakers, must analyze what they are writing down.  The difference of written and oral text shows how the change in writing space can change the way in which a person writes.
            So why does the change of writing space change the way we think and vice versa?  To analyze this one must know why writing is so important.  Writing has always been the most effective way for humans to communicate and remember events, although the way society uses writing has changed over generations.  It was first used as a way of remembering stories, facts and events.  As humans became more advanced, their writing became much more developed as well.  Society began to not only want to remember stories and events, but also to write down their thoughts, hopes and dreams.  Philosophers like Plato and Socrates began to both write and speak about their philosophies.  Spoken and written texts now became the newest forms of writing spaces, but these two forms were so different that they often challenged each other.  Plato, the written philosopher, and Socrates, the oral philosopher, both differed in what they felt a writing space was.  Writing was now used differently than it was when it was first developed.
These changes in writing forced writing spaces to change as well.  Over time the writing space has changed and developed to fit the times.  Because the way that we communicate, think, and write changes, our writing spaces must change as well.  Papyrus rolls and scrolls served a different purpose than codexes and books.  New forms of writing spaces were invented because they needed to most effectively record what people were writing at that time.  The modern WebPages and eBooks are the newest forms of writing spaces.  They make writing and information accessible to everyone, anywhere and at anytime. 
The great American author Truman Capote once said, “A writing space is not a physical place, but a place inside your imagination.”  Capote is referring to the writing space in one’s mind.  This writing space is where one’s stories, philosophies, ideas and thoughts are created.  After the author creates writing in his or her head, he or she must leave that writing space to enter another writing space, the physical writing space.  The development of human’s means of communication affects the way in which human kind thinks.  The way that human kind thinks affects the way humans write, and finally these developments influence the physical writing space.  The way that society thinks and communicates changes the way that they write on their writing spaces.









Bibliography
Bolter, J. David. Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001. Print.
Maisel, Eric. A Writer's Space: Make Room to Dream, to Work, to Write,. Avon, MA: Adams Media, 2008. Print.
Truman Capote. Web. 25 Apr. 2011. <http://www.capotebio.com/index.php>.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Interesting Video About LANGUAGE

"Writing Space" by J. David Bolter Chapter 5, "The Electronic Book"

This prezi on Chapter 5 was extremely well organized.  It had light blue, pink, and white writing on a dark gray background.  The points made flowed from one to another by arrows.  The physical arrows from one point to anther helped the viewer to organize the points in his or her own head.  The prezi itself was also not as zoomed in as most of the other projects. When the presenter had one specific quote from "Writing Space" on the screen, you could still see the other points because it was zoomed out.  I feel as though this was a weakness because it did not make the viewer solely focus on just that point.  This prezi also did not include as many examples.  It only had one example which was a YouTube video that discussed the difference of eBooks vs. printed books.  More examples could have helped explain the presentation.  Some of the presentations strengths included its extreme organization.  Also, it was almost theatrical in the way it was "presented," or shall I say, "performed!"  The presentations were very well prepared and they presented the information very well.

 1.    1. How is a codex different from a modern-day book?
2.     2. Is a web page never ending with no closure, like a papyrus roll?
3.     3. Which is more authentic? The eBook or the book?
4.     4. Are electronic encyclopedias or text encyclopedias more useful?
5.     5. Will physical libraries not exist in the future?
6.     6. Will people stop finding information they need in printed books?      


This presentation begin and ended with the same quote from Bolter's "Writing Space."  This quote was, "They are writing in and on the world."  This quote refers to how all writing spaces are important and utilized in today's society.  The beginning of the presentation discussed how the book has changed throughout time.  The papyrus roll was the first form of the "book."  Papyrus rolls were about 25 feet long and were cut after the author was done writing them.  They were scripts that story tellers would use.  Papyrus rolls then developed into codexes.  A codex was a cousin to today's modern book.  Codexes replaced papyrus because they were more complete and bound together.  They protected and delimited writing and made written work a complete verbal structure.  They were different from papyrus rolls because they had to fill predetermined space.  Codexes also closed off other works because they were only one story long.  Then the prezi discussed the chnages that "books" have made throughout time.  The shift goes as follows: papyrus->codex->book->eBook.  eBooks seem like they are close to the papyrus rolls because they can scroll up and down, like a papyrus can roll.  Lastly, the encyclopedia was a new invention that took all information and put it into one place.  The encyclopedia became one of the first books to not read all the way through.  It became a benchmark to hold all credited facts and sources.  Britannica was one of the first printed encyclopedias, but it also became electronic to fit with the modern times.  The presentation ended by saying that cyber space will become the universal book, encyclopedia, and library all in one.

Monday, April 11, 2011

"Writing Space" by J. David Bolter Chapter 4, "The Breakout of the Visual"


The prezi physically was a black background with all of the text in white writing.  Within the text there was also examples that included a graph and a picture.  The main strength of this project was its organization.  The presenters organized the prezi very well and each presenter’s points flowed nicely with the other presenters.  Also, the examples used in the prezi were helpful and beneficial to the audience.  The examples included helped explain the points in the prezi.  Some weaknesses include that the prezi itself was sometimes hard to read and sometimes the prezi had some repetition.  Some of the text in the prezi was too small to read and the black background made the text sometimes ard to read.  Also, the presenters sometimes repeated each other, and sometimes their points seemed to be repetitive as well.  Overall, the presentation was effective and informative.

1.     How do books with no pictures have “visuals?”
2.     What exactly are electronic magazines?
3.     How is email not electronically advanced?  Can’t emails link videos and visuals?
4.     If graphs include text then how are they visuals?
5.     How is a “metaphor” in a book considered a visual description?
6.     Are we going back to the medieval times with how we write because we now often include visuals within our writing like that did in the medieval times.

This presentation made many points about how text can be considered visual.  Printed text in the Medieval Ages was very different than it is today.  Text at this time included many pictures and visuals around the actual text.  Although, Bolter says that print is remaking itself to be more like these medieval texts.  Newspapers, like USA Today, include a lot of pictures and visuals.  These pictures enhance the visual experience and give a more behind the scene look to what the reader is reading.  Another example of something that is purely visual and does not require many words are graphs.  Graphs have few words, but they visually make their point without needing a lot of writing and paragraphs.  Bolter explains that text can also make visuals through the use of metaphors and descriptions within text.  Text is also developing into visual work.  Books that are made into movies are a perfect example of this.  Also, the use of “Ekphrasis” transforms readers into viewers.  Electronically (we obviously have to reference the electronic age because we are reading Bolter!) books are being changed from purely textual electronic books to combined visual and textual electronic magazines.  The hypermedia is now replacing the hypertext.  


Friday, April 8, 2011

"Writing Space" by J. David Bolter Chapter 3, "Hypertext and the Remediation of Hypertext"



What I Heard in the Telephone Game: "Thinking Critically about the Bolter Text"

The lay out of the Prezi was a dark blue background with white text.  There was one YouTube video that was a satirical look at hypertexts.  The text was all bullets points with many direct quotations from "Writing Space" by Bolter.  One huge strength in this prezi was the real examples of web pages that had hypertext. Showing these examples from the actual websites "Wikipedia" and "ebay" really showed what hypertexts look like within real web pages.  A second huge strength was that the presenters used so many direct quotes from the chapter.  These quotations made the text come alive for audience and made them focus on how the presentation directly related to the text.  It also showed that the presenters really read the chapter and analyzed it.  This was impressive.  Lastly, the prezi was organized very well and it “flowed” very nicely.  One weakness of the"prezi" was that there were spelling mistakes!  For a presentation on hypertext and the advantages of technology, it was annoying that some words were spelled wrong!  The Internet can help correct spelling and it was not utilized fully.  Another weakness was that the presenters were sometimes unprofessional while presenting.  It was distracting and made the audience not fully focus on the information being presented.

         The point of Chapter 3 of “Writing Space by J. David Bolter, "Hypertext and the Remediation of Hypertext" was to discuss what hypertext is, the existence of hypertext and the difference between hypertext and regular text.  The presenter’s describes hypertext as being a link on a webpage that can create relationships between different things.  Hypertext creates a network.  It can take the reader on a path, from one idea to another.  This presentation also contrasted books and web pages.  Books give the reader control, but not as much imagination.  Hypertext can enhance the imagination and overall experience for the reader.  This chapter highlights the importance of hypertexts. 

Can there be hypertext within books?  (Not just in the index of the book or in "Make Your Own Adventure" books, but actually within the writing in the book like you would see within a web page.)  Is hypertext easier or more challenging than regular text?  How is hypertext a path when it really can take the reader in so many different non-sequential directions?  Can hypertext be more effective to proving arguments than regular text?  What can hypertexts do that books cannot?  Does hypertext or books give the reader more control?